We’ve all seen them; we have even taken footage of ourselves pretending to carry them up or to push them over.
These are the precariously balanced rocks on a hill or a coastal cliff. It’s as if the gentlest nudge would ship them tumbling.
In fact, the disturbance wanted to unsettle the blocks is sort of vital, and that received husband and spouse geologists Drs Dylan and Anna Rood questioning about how these nice stones may very well be used to decipher earthquake historical past.
Think about it: if a precariously balanced rock has held its place for 10,000 years with out tipping over, it means the land across the stone hasn’t skilled shaking above a sure degree in all that point.
“The turn of phrase we’re trying to coin is that these precariously balanced rocks, or PBRs, are an ‘inverse seismometer’,” explains Anna.
“A normal seismometer records an event that has happened, whereas our PBR is still standing there, and so it records an earthquake that hasn’t happened. Specifically, a large earthquake,” the Imperial College London, UK, researcher tells BBC News.
This is admittedly helpful info if you wish to construct a nuclear energy station or waste repository; or possibly a serious dam or bridge.
Knowing how sturdy that construction must be requires an understanding of the seismic hazards that would moderately be foreseen throughout its lifetime.
Can it count on a sure threshold of shaking as soon as each 100 years, or each 1,000 years, or certainly solely as soon as each 10,000 years? The reply will bear straight on the price of a secure development in addition to the insurance coverage threat.
Planners could also be lucky in that the situation the place they wish to put up that new energy station already has an in depth, instrumented document of seismic behaviour. But there might be locations the place that document is sparse – locations the place it is identified giant tremors can happen however the place the historical past of the dimensions and frequency of occasions is extraordinarily patchy.
For these websites, geologists will usually conduct what’s known as a probabilistic seismic hazard evaluation during which they will attempt to mannequin the probabilities, taking account of all of the potential native sources of earthquakes, resembling close by fault traces.
What Dylan and Anna have now proven is that any precariously balanced rocks within the neighborhood can be utilized to constrain these fashions by excluding probably the most far-out-there potentialities.
As proof of precept they studied PBRs close to the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant in coastal Central California.
These are tall chert blocks which have eroded freed from the encompassing rock platform and as a consequence might fall over given the correct amount of shaking. But exactly how a lot shaking can be wanted, and the way lengthy the blocks have been on this free-standing state are the 2 unknowns the workforce needed to resolve to make use of the PBRs as inverse seismometers.
The quantity of shaking is labored out by taking numerous photographs of the PBRs and making a 3D mannequin. Various equations will then elicit the energy of the bottom accelerations required to topple the rock.
Working out the second half – the “age of fragility” – depends on a wise method that tracks modifications induced within the rocks as they have been uncovered to energetic area particles via time.
Cosmic rays after they hit the oxygen atoms in chert’s quartz minerals will generate the radioactive factor beryllium-10. Counting the quantity of Be-10 within the blocks’ surfaces subsequently provides an estimate for a way lengthy the stones have been of their precarious scenario.
The outcomes of the PBR investigation for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant ought to be reassuring, says Anna.
“We all know we’re on shaky ground in California, but our results show that it’s not as shaky as we had feared.
“Importantly, we have made the earthquake shaking estimates twice as sure. We’ve proven that an earthquake with shaking sturdy sufficient to topple our precariously balanced rocks – and that will probably crack the bottom and buildings’ partitions – has not been recorded by our inverse seismometers over the previous roughly 21,000 years.”
The motive the sort of evaluation is so helpful within the particular case of Diablo Canyon is that the principle quake “threat” comes from the so-called Hosgri Fault, which is situated some 6km offshore, beneath water.
“So there are a lot of these sites of interest of critical infrastructure that are located on or near the coast, because of the cooling water needs, and where the hazards are offshore – as evidenced by the Fukushima nuclear plant and the Tohoku earthquake of 2011,” says Dylan.
“And unlike [land faults] where you can just go dig trenches and reconstruct the magnitude-frequency relationship and the amount of slip per time, etc – that’s incredibly hard to do with these offshore faults. That’s where PBRs can deliver for us.”
But how obtainable are they? Can you discover enough numbers of them to make inverse seismometers a broadly relevant method?
There’s a set of rock varieties the place such options can kind, says Anna. “The vertical joints set is all you need. And, once you know what you’re looking for and get your eye in – they are actually much more ubiquitous than you might think.”
Drs Dylan and Anna Rood, and colleagues, report their PBR work within the journal AGU Advances.
and comply with me on Twitter: @BBCAmos