The authorities is barely scratching the floor in terms of utilizing its taxation instruments to battle in opposition to wealth inequality, in accordance with an economist ceaselessly cited by Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland earlier than her political profession.
Freeland’s up to date mandate letter, revealed earlier this month, directs her to “identify additional ways to tax extreme wealth inequality.” But to date, that appears restricted to “very gingerly” closing some inventory choice loopholes, Miles Corak mentioned in an interview on CBC Radio’s The House.
If the federal government needs to make substantial efforts to scale back wealth inequality and its “corrosive” results on social mobility, Corak advised host Chris Hall, the primary place to begin is to stay with the taxation precept of “a dollar is a dollar” and deal with earnings and capital features the identical method. Currently, solely half of capital features — the rise in worth of investments, akin to shares — qualify as taxable earnings.
“That’s a huge benefit to the well-to-do,” Corak mentioned. “That is the elephant in the room.”
Corak, a professor on the Graduate Center of the City University of New York, is greatest recognized for his work contributing to the “Great Gatsby curve” — a chart exhibiting the connection between inequality and lack of social mobility. That analysis was ceaselessly referred to by Freeland in her former profession as a journalist and writer.
CBC News: The House8:27Is Chrystia Freeland uniquely positioned to tax the wealthy?
Government approaches go away a lot off the desk: Corak
But because the deputy prime minister begins consultations forward of her first price range as Canada’s finance minister, Corak mentioned the federal government’s actions is probably not residing as much as the financial inequality problem Freeland described seven years in the past earlier than coming into politics. It relies upon, he mentioned, on how the federal government interprets its personal guarantees round taxing excessive wealth inequality and making the wealthy pay their “fair share.”
If the price range “just focuses on a very narrow interpretation of those phrases, I think a good deal will be left off the table in a way that Minister Freeland, the author, might somehow regret,” Corak mentioned.
The thought of closing inventory choice loopholes and even beefing up enforcement by the Canada Revenue Agency shouldn’t be as vital because the wealth tax proposed by the federal NDP or debated within the United States, Corak mentioned.
To really assault wealth inequality he mentioned, extra bold motion is required, together with eliminating the taxation hole between capital features and earnings, and implementing one thing like an inheritance tax.
The economist mentioned Freeland was an knowledgeable observer of the challenges going through many Canadians, and he or she was a principled individual sincerely appearing to profit Canadians.
“But she’s also a capable politician,” he mentioned. “And sometimes in politics, where you stand depends upon where you sit. And she sits in the seat of the minister of finance.”