Home » Courts of enchantment in 4 areas a should to ease burden on SC: AG | India News

Courts of enchantment in 4 areas a should to ease burden on SC: AG | India News

by newsking24

NEW DELHI: Attorney common Ok Ok Venugopal on Thursday stated Courts of Appeal should be arrange in 4 areas of the nation to adjudicate appeals towards HC verdicts to offer residents higher entry to justice and ease the huge case burden on the Supreme Court to make it actually the constitutional courtroom envisaged by framers of the Constitution.
Speaking on the Constitution Day celebrations to mark the beginning of Constitution today in 1949, Venugopal stated the SC is now burdened with petitions on bail, hire disputes, land acquisition, matrimonial disputes, which may very well be heard by the Courts of Appeal (CoA) for rendering a last resolution. “Each of the CoA should have around 15 Judges, who should have similar eligibility qualifications as SC Judges and they would be selected by the Collegium of SC Judges headed by the Chief Justice of India,” he stated.
“Creation of CoA in between the HCs and the SC will enable the SC to hear petitions raising important constitutional questions and matters of national importance instead of mundane and regular appeals against HC decisions. Then only the SC can truly become a constitutional court as envisaged by the framers of our Constitution. It would then hear 3,000 cases a year rather than the present 75,000 cases,” he stated.
Otherwise, the circumstances would proceed to take many years for last adjudication, he stated. “If one has to wait for two decades for a final verdict in a case, then justice would fail the poor litigants and the middle class. The rich and corporates are not much affected by the delay in justice delivery,” the AG stated.
President Ram Nath Kovind, who as a lawyer had practiced in SC, stated the price of litigation has develop into the one largest obstacle for residents to entry justice. “That is why I have done many cases pro-bono (free of cost). I would urge the lawyers to do some cases pro bono.”
“The second hurdle to access to justice is the language. It is a welcome step by the SC to publish important judgments in many regional languages. This is the way forward to keep the citizens in the loop and bring them closer to the judiciary and its working,” the President stated. He stated the constitutional put up holders should emulate what Rajendra Prasad had stated whereas responding to congratulations on appointment as first President of India. Prasad had stated that if he will get equally appreciated on the time of demitting the workplace, then solely he would really feel worthy of the put up, Kovind stated.
Law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad stated the SC had been the beacon of Justice by way of its landmark judgments, together with propounding of fundamental construction doctrine and increasing of the ambit, scope and character of the valuable proper to life assured underneath Article 21 of the Constitution.
Prasad stated, “Of late, there is a disturbing trend of some people campaigning through social media and newspaper articles insisting on what the SC judgment/order should be in a particular case. And, when the SC does not stick to the course outlined by them, they resort to sweeping criticism of the SC and judiciary. Judges must be left free to decide cases without inhibitions attempted to be imposed by these persons.”
He stated, “Justice delivery cannot be meant for the gallery. Use of terms like ‘judicial barbarism’ by those, whatever be their status, is abhorable and unacceptable. Judiciary and Judges must feel free to decide cases as per law and their conscience. Unleashing such kind of criticism is an attempt to deflect the judges from their avowed duty.”
CJI S A bobde stated the judiciary confronted a problem of both closing down the courts on account of pandemic or preserve them open by way of video conferencing. He stated the three-tier judiciary heard round 50 lakh circumstances through the pandemic interval and disposed of 6.5 lakh circumstances. “But, video conferencing hearing creates inequality as those who do not have access to technology find it difficult to access the justice delivery system. I would request the law minister, who is also the Information Technology minister to find a solution, though it may require large expenditure on the part of the government,” the CJI stated.

Source hyperlink

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Select Language »
%d bloggers like this: