Home » Advocate writes to AG in search of consent to provoke contempt continuing towards Prashant Bhushan | India News

Advocate writes to AG in search of consent to provoke contempt continuing towards Prashant Bhushan | India News

by newsking24

NEW DELHI: An advocate has written to Attorney General Okay Okay Venugopal in search of his consent to provoke felony contempt proceedings towards activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan for his remarks made throughout a current interview to a newspaper.
The letter by advocate Sunil Kumar Singh claimed the November 29 interview of Bhushan makes an “insinuation that Supreme Court of India does not function in an impartial manner.”
According to the lawyer, the contents of the interview have been prima facie “contumacious” and a “gross insinuation against the entirety of the top court”.
“This is a gross insinuation against the entirety of the Supreme Court, that the Supreme Court of India is not an independent and impartial institution but is willing to kowtow to the government. It is highly objectionable and audacious. It is a malicious attack on the hon’ble Supreme Court,” the letter acknowledged.
The lawyer claimed that such statements have been “mala fide and motivated to denigrate the highest judiciary as part of an orchestrated campaign.”
“The statements made by Prashant Bhushan are of a very serious nature. They are mala fide and motivated to denigrate the higher judiciary. The insinuation against the entire Supreme Court of India that it is not an independent and impartial institution but is willing to kowtow to the government is clearly calculated to undermine the public confidence in the independence and impartiality of Supreme Court of India,” the letter acknowledged.
Terming Bhushan a “chronic contemnor”, Singh stated regardless of being there many contempt proceedings earlier than the Supreme Court pending towards him, he isn’t desisting from making “irresponsible, contemptuous and contumacious statements” towards the honourable judges of the apex court docket.
Earlier, the lawyer basic had declined consent for initiation of felony contempt proceedings towards Bhushan for his tweets wherein he was crucial of Chief Justice of India (CJI) S A Bobde being supplied a particular helicopter by the Madhya Pradesh authorities, saying the activist-lawyer later expressed remorse.
The Supreme Court had on August 31 imposed a “nominal fine” of Re 1 on Bhushan after he was convicted of felony contempt for his two tweets towards the judiciary, observing it was “showing magnanimity” as a substitute of handing out any extreme punishment.

Source hyperlink

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Select Language »
%d bloggers like this: